WORKING FOR PRE-IPO FIRM LOSING ITS LUSTER?
EMPLOYEES HESITANT TO MAKE THE LEAP TO STARTUPS,
NEW BRIDGEGATE SURVEY REVEALS
Many Prefer
Role of Investor to Employee -- But Study Hints at New Kind of
Digital Divide, Between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Economy Workers
IRVINE, Calif. (May 1, 2000) – As if
anticipating the market’s sudden ambivalence about the dot-com economy, a new
nationwide survey reveals that many American workers are skittish about the
prospect of sacrificing a high salary for the opportunity to work for a pre-IPO
startup -- and finds that most would prefer to experience an initial public
offering as an investor rather than as an employee.
At the same time, this general
wariness is anything but uniform – and suggests a different kind of split
within the workforce, between those employed by companies in the “old economy”
and those working for high-growth, high-technology “new economy”
organizations. If you’re young, urban,
degreed and reasonably well paid, you’re marginally more likely to give a
startup a shot.
The just-released BridgeGate Report, conducted in late
February by Market Facts, Inc. of Chicago for technology recruiter BridgeGate
LLC, surveyed nearly 700 working Americans, seeking to gauge the level of
interest in joining companies on the verge of an IPO. The image of the “dot-com millionaire” – and the coveted ability
to simply get into an IPO on the ground floor – has fueled a get-rich-quick
mentality that appears to slow dramatically at the hiring manager’s door.
With offices in Irvine BridgeGate builds
management teams for high-growth companies.
Survey data was collected five weeks before the April 14 stock market
correction.
The BridgeGate survey shows that employees generally believe
that while investing in a high-flier is one thing, working for one is quite
another. Although both full- and part-time workers do express some
interest in being part of such a company, an overwhelming percentage is
unwilling to accept the low salaries associated with pre-IPO companies.
Indeed, nearly 43 percent of workers said flat-out that they
would not be interested in working for such a company. While more than half of all respondents
expressed qualified interest in working for a pre-IPO company, caution remains
their guiding light. Some 44 percent
said they would be interested only on condition of receiving a competitive
salary, while only six percent would take less in salary for the opportunity. Five percent would be interested only if
they could cash out quickly.
Overall, young, urban, better-paid workers with some college
education were the most likely to be willing to sacrifice salary to work for a
start-up. At the other end of the
compensation spectrum, workers in the lowest income bracket (less than $25,000
annually) proved to be among the most willing to play the odds of hitting it
big with an IPO: fully twice as many were open to accepting a lower salary than
those in the $50K-$75K bracket.
Of those who responded negatively, 24 percent reported they
would not be interested in signing on with a pre-IPO firm under any
circumstances, while nearly 19 percent said they would invest in such a company
but not work for one.
“There seems to be a different kind of ‘Digital Divide’
emerging – ‘old economy’ workers versus ‘new economy’ workers,” said Dudley
Brown, managing partner, BridgeGate LLC, Southern California’s largest
technology search firm. “The ‘new economy’ attracts mostly
young, urban, educated professionals who are already testing their earning
power. Employees in more traditional
organizations exhibit the greatest aversion to joining the pre-IPO
bandwagon.
“These findings clearly demonstrate that Americans
understand the difference between their roles as investors and as employees,
and many are reluctant to gamble with their careers,” Brown said. “That’s not to say that it wouldn’t be wise
to work for a company on the verge of going public. On the contrary, it can be a tremendously rewarding
experience. But the mystique of the
pre-IPO firm bumps up hard against the reality that many companies don’t make
it. Employees realize that a great many
other factors make up a positive work environment – good benefits, training,
flexible hours, a nurturing environment in which they are given the opportunity
to thrive – and these can come from any kind of employer.
“Ultimately, people should want to work for companies that
see beyond the IPO, companies that understand they are not in business just to
go public,” Brown continued. “Any
company that emphasizes an IPO over bringing exciting new products and services
to market isn’t destined for long-term survival. Accordingly, employees need to be vigilant, and take at least as
much care in choosing their workplaces as their investments.”
A demographic breakdown of survey respondents provides
further clues about employee attitudes toward working for companies about to go
public:
·
In the most dramatic
evidence of this new Digital Divide, workers with household incomes above $75K+
are more than three times as likely to take less in salary for the chance to
work for such a company than those in the $50K-75K bracket; meanwhile, workers
making less than $25K were more than twice as likely as those in the $50K-75K
category to accept a lower salary
·
Similarly, workers
with some college education or a degree are more likely to sign up with a
pre-IPO startup than those with high school education or less and those with
some post-graduate education or a post-graduate degree (58, 51 and just under
52 percent respectively)
·
The genders differ:
men are nearly three times as likely to be willing to take less in salary to
work for such a company (nearly 9 percent, against 3 percent for women), while
significantly more women would not be interested in working for such a company
under any circumstances (30 percent vs. just under 19 percent)
·
Age is a factor: More than 58 percent of workers over the age
of 55 are not interested in working for such a company, while nearly that same
percentage of workers in the 18-24 age group said they would be open to it.
·
Geography likewise
figures into the mix: employees in the Northeast are twice as likely as those
in the West, and nearly three times as likely as those in the Midwest, to be
willing to take a lower salary to work for an IPO candidate (11, 5 and nearly 4
percent, respectively)
·
Surprisingly, workers
with a child in the household were more likely to accept a lower salary than
childless workers (just over 7 percent vs. nearly 5 percent), but overall, a
higher percentage of people without children said they would be interested in
working for a company on the verge of an IPO (almost 58 percent vs. just over
51 percent for those without children).
The BridgeGate survey of 672 working Americans was conducted
February 25-27, 2000 by Market Facts, Inc. TeleNation. The margin of error is +/- approximately 4
percent. For a copy of the survey
results, please call 818/719-9292.
About BridgeGate LLC
With offices in Irvine,
Calif. and Los Angeles, BridgeGate LLC specializes in executive search within
the information technology and Internet sectors. BridgeGate’s ability to target and attract superior performers
has made the firm an active partner in developing and growing successful
organizations for more than 30 years.
Today, BridgeGate is the largest technology recruiter in Southern
California.
Unique among search firms, BridgeGate’s mandate is to build
teams, addressing a full range of disciplines, from operations to
sales/marketing to consulting. By
supporting multiple specialties within a single engagement, the firm has
embraced a “complete recruitment solution” philosophy for clients. With an unwavering commitment to the 3 R’s
-- research, relationships and results – BridgeGate has made a strategic
difference for such companies as Buy.com, Stamps.com, E.phiphany and
PeopleSupport.com.
For more information, contact:
BridgeGate LLC
949.553.9200